If a compliance software is priced at $12,000 per year. Does that sound like a lot?
It all depends on the item you’re replacing.
If $12,000 can be used to eliminate hundreds of hours collecting evidence in a complex technological environment that could be worth investing. If a seven-person startup could have the same proof manually in a few hours each month, the calculation appears to be quite different.
That’s a useful way to approach the search for a Vanta alternative. Do not start with asking which platform offers the most features. Consider what these features can allow your company to save time and work.
Automation Has an Economic Break-Even The Key
It’s not inherently either good or bad. The value of compliance automation will change as the company expands. Imagine a rapidly growing tech company that has multiple cloud environments and many applications. Gathering evidence manually could be a major operational burden. Integrations that automatically monitor systems and take evidence are able to justify the expense.
Imagine a company of 10 people who are preparing to go through its first SOC 2. audit. The infrastructure could be small, and evidence collection is still manageable even without significant automation.
The distinction is crucial when evaluating Vanta pricing. A high-end platform can offer vast capabilities, but these capabilities deliver financial value only when the organization actually needs they.
Compare Architecture, not Just Brands
A search for Vanta and Drata will quickly turn into an exercise of feature-by-feature. Both are reputable compliance platforms built around automation and integrations. As such, comparing their supported frameworks including integrations, service agreements, and individual quotes could prove useful to companies searching for that method.
There’s a second decision to take first, however. Do you have a company that is interested in an integration-driven system for compliance? Certain companies would like constant monitoring as well as automated collection of evidence. Some businesses prefer to collect evidence on their own.
Vanta Competitors Do not all follow the same model
A lot of Vanta competitors are also in the same space that is focused on automation. On the market, there are also platforms with less cluttered designs which focus more on the system’s organization, rather and connectivity.
CertAssist is in the second category. The product was created by compliance consultants as well as internal auditors, CertAssist organizes framework controls within a single workspace. It gives editable policies and evidence guidance, and allows auditors to examine evidence submitted through restricted access.
It is deliberately not connected to operating systems, nor install infrastructure agents. Customers are able to upload the evidence they choose.
Consideration of System Access in the Making
It is clear that cutting off integrations can be a disadvantage. One must gather evidence manually.
The application for compliance doesn’t need integration or integration and may be used with no permanent connections to the operating environment.
The structures of one are not superior to the other. Which choice is best for your company?
CertAssist is targeted towards teams that have between five and 200 employees and offers pricing information rather than having to have an in-person sales meeting. The initial price listed for CertAssist is $225 per monthly rather than a regular $375.
Let Complexity Find Its Place
What is required of a startup that has 10 employees aren’t necessarily the same as those of an organization with 100 or 500 employees.
A simple platform could be beneficial while compliance stays easy. As the number of employees, systems frameworks, and evidence requirements increase, the economy could eventually favor greater automation. Allow complexity to take the lead when purchasing compliance technology.
Do not purchase fifty different integrations because they seem impressive in the comparison chart. You should pay for them only if the cost of doing the job they replace manually is greater.