Imagine a compliance platform that costs you $12,000 per year. Is that expensive?
It’s dependent on the part you are replacing.
If automated collection eliminates hundreds of hours of repetitive evidence collection in a tangled technology environment, $12,000 could be money well spent. The calculations would be different if a startup of seven people could collect the same amount of evidence in just the time of a few minutes every month.
It’s a smart method to begin your search for the best Vanta alternative. Identifying the platform with the best features is not the only thing to consider. Ask your company how these features will save you time and money.
The Break-Even Point for Automation
It’s not inherently either good or bad. The value of compliance automation alters as the business grows. Imagine a company that is growing with multiple cloud environments as well as various applications. The manual process of collecting evidence can be a major burden for the operation. Integrations that can automatically monitor systems and gather evidence can justly justify the expense.
Now consider a 10-person startup preparing for its first SOC 2. It could have a smaller infrastructure, and the gathering of evidence can be managed with no significant automation.
That difference matters when evaluating Vanta pricing. The capabilities of an advanced platform are impressive, however they are only useful when an organization needs them.
Compare Architecture And Not Just Brands
Vanta vs Drata is a debate that can easily become a feature-by-feature test. It is important to compare the services, features contract and quotes offered by each platform. Both are well-established systems for compliance that are focused on integrations and automation.
But there’s still another decision you’ll need to take. Does your company want an integrated compliance platform at all? Some companies want continuous monitoring and automated evidence collection. Some companies prefer to collect evidence on their own.
Vanta Competitors don’t all follow the exact same guidelines.
Many well-known Vanta competitors compete within a similar automation-focused category. There are also platforms with less cluttered designs which focus more on the organization of systems rather and connectivity.
CertAssist is in the second category. CertAssist was designed by internal auditors as well as compliance consultants. It combines framework controls into a central workspace. It also provides editable guidance on policy and evidence. Auditors can examine the evidence provided through a purely read interface.
It doesn’t intend to connect to operational systems or create infrastructure agents. Customers decide to upload the documents they would like to share.
Factor System Access into the Decision
Eliminating integrations has a distinct drawback: you have to gather evidence by hand.
It also gets rid of integration setup and means the compliance application does not require standing connections to the company’s operational environment.
The design and architecture of one is not superior to each other. Which one is appropriate for your business?
CertAssist targets teams with five to 200 employees and gives pricing information, instead of having the sales pitch. The stated launch price for CertAssist per month is $225 instead of the usual $375.
Let Complexity Earn Its Place
What is required of a startup with 10 employees aren’t necessarily exactly the same as the company that has 100 or 500 workers.
While compliance is straightforward A lightweight platform could be a good idea. As the number of systems, employees frameworks, evidence and requirements grow, the economics will eventually favour deeper automation. Allow complexity to take the lead when purchasing compliance technology.
Don’t pay for fifty integrations because they appear impressive in a chart of comparison. You should pay for them when manually doing the job they replace becomes more costly.